Reconstructed first-round book from the research data, not a scrape of today's website. Public portfolio pages over-report winners, and this graph has the same public-data bias. Investor edges are essentially Crunchbase through late 2015, plus Y Combinator.
Research book · 3-year follow-on
K9 Ventures vs Kairos
Not ranked
Whole-book follow-on hit rate 66.7% (4 of 6 labeled deals). 95% Wilson interval 30.0%–90.3%. Vintage-weighted base rate 48.4%. This is not a fund return.
Not ranked. A book needs at least 15 labeled deals with a vintage base rate. This one has 6.
Vs same-vintage base rate
+18.3 pp
66.7% on 6 deals vs 48.4%
Vs median VC book
+5.2 pp
66.7% on 6 deals vs 61.5%
Vs top-quartile VC
-11.7 pp
66.7% on 6 deals vs 78.4%
Vs Y Combinator
-1.4 pp
66.7% on 6 deals vs 68.1%
Ranked when at least 15 labeled deals have a vintage base rate. Rank is the average-rank percentile of shrunk excess (20 pseudo-deals at that book's vintage base rate) among eligible VC books that clear the same minimum. 100 is best. The whole book is never compared to Kairos's top-50 hit rate.
What Kairos would have said
Scores are the model’s percentile at each company’s first observed funding event, not at a later round. That matches this fund’s entry only when the fund was in the first-round syndicate. A deal is flagged when its percentile clears that vintage’s top-50 cutoff. The whole book is not compared to the top-50 hit rate.
Deals with a score
6
Mean model percentile
85
Flagged deals
11/1 followed on
Companies
6 labeled follow-on deals, 0 matched without an observable label (dropped, not counted as failures).
| Company | Vintage | Follow-on | Kairos percentile | Flagged |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HighlightCamhighlightcam.com | 2009 | Yes | 100 | Yes |
| CrowdFlowercrowdflower.com | 2009 | Yes | 98 | — |
| Lucid Software Incgolucid.co | 2011 | Yes | 84 | — |
| card.iocard.io | 2011 | No | 81 | — |
| IndexTankindextank.com | 2011 | No | 79 | — |
| eSharesesharesinc.com | 2013 | Yes | 67 | — |